Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MattLarson
Well, now, Muspell, we all ain't as smart as you is, so if you wanna splain it to us, you gotta type slow.
Matt |
Nah, just read it slowly and pretend like I'm speaking to you like you're stupid. Works a treat.
But I hope you understand the problem here, perhaps? That defending Saddam is suddenly turning into an attack on Bush? And ultimately on the United States, of course.
That is, the case the defense for Saddam will make is going to be an attack on the current US foreign policy. What that means, and if that translates into that Clark is an anti- american partisan, I suppose will be up to you people. And obviously, since I don't underestimate any of you, I wouldn't dream of that a smear- campaign against Clark is going to strike home and blow away all kinds of consideration for the actual case that is being made. Much less what this case, democracy and crap like that actually means. Oh, no. Never will happen.