Saddam's trial is meaningless pomp.

The U.S. guaranteed at least his execution the moment they undertook their illegal murderous oil heist invasion.

Everything that happens in Iraq from the moment of the beginning of the illegal invasion, from the ousting of Saddam to the creation of a "democratic" puppet government, is nothing but the fall of the dominos of the process, the fall of no domino being in any way rightly justified.

Thereby the horrific sham of this trial is not to be overlooked, nor is the right of Saddam to still be the leader of Iraq, the U.N. internaltional right that we illegally stole from him.

No matter how horrific Saddam was (allegedly), he was a U.N. matter, not a U.S. matter.

Thus proving that our essentially unilateral invasion of Iraq and ousting him as our oil-management puppet of choice was not about the "crimes" Saddam allegedly committed according to untrustworthy () U.S. intelligence (crimes which the Bush administration could have cared less about), but was all about the fact that Saddam was about to stop selling oil to us once the sanctions lifted -- vital irreplacable light sweet Iraqi crude oil that we've been receiving for decades and upon which we depend or fall into a depression and take our allies with us -- and divert that oil to China instead.