Quote:
|
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips
Taking a specific incident and using it to make sweeping generalizations about a large group of people is not only an excercise in logical fallacy, but it also runs very close to the line between exaggeration and willfull dishonesty.
Of course, liberals hate honesty, so it isn't a surprise.
|
Another example would be the ludicrous "Gay Marraige" amendment. How many examples does it take before sweeping generalizations become ok?