Quote:
|
Originally Posted by hairballxavier
Where are you comming up with your numbers for the enemy casualties.
I think you just made them up.
Typical liberal.
Nothing to back up your claims.
|
Haurballxavier, I never made up any casualties for the Iraqi armed resistance/terrorists in Iraq.
All I said was that so far, the Iraqi resistance has inflicted 22,000 casualties on the Coalition troops, and I doubt the Coalition has been able to inflict as many casualties on the Iraqi armed resistance/terrorists in Iraq.
I asked you what you think about that, and so far you haven't provided an answer. That could be interpreted as an admission that the Coalition troops are losing more troops than the number of armed enemy combatants that they are able to take out. Now that should serve as a very important warningng signal to the planners in the White House and the Pentagon before they enter the next war adventure. Or maybe that in fact is the main reason why Bush has not attacked Iran or Syria?