Visit the Active Site for the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forums!

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum Archives  

Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum Archives > Issue Politics > Activism / Consumer Affairs
FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-01-2005, 12:07 AM
roddy's Avatar
roddy roddy is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: earth
Posts: 1,303
Default Revealed: health fears over secret study into GM food

an article from the independent.co.uk - I took this full version from commondreams.org:

Quote:
Revealed: Health Fears Over Secret Study into GM Food
Rats fed GM corn due for sale in Britain developed abnormalities in blood and kidneys

by Geoffrey Lean

Rats fed on a diet rich in genetically modified corn developed abnormalities to internal organs and changes to their blood, raising fears that human health could be affected by eating GM food.

The Independent on Sunday can today reveal details of secret research carried out by Monsanto, the GM food giant, which shows that rats fed the modified corn had smaller kidneys and variations in the composition of their blood.

According to the confidential 1,139-page report, these health problems were absent from another batch of rodents fed non-GM food as part of the research project.

The disclosures come as European countries, including Britain, prepare to vote on whether the GM-modified corn should go on sale to the public. A vote last week by the European Union failed to secure agreement over whether the product should be sold here, after Britain and nine other countries voted in favor.

However, the disclosure of the health effects on the Monsanto rats has intensified the row over whether the corn is safe to eat without further research. Doctors said the changes in the blood of the rodents could indicate that the rat's immune system had been damaged or that a disorder such as a tumor had grown and the system was mobilizing to fight it.

Dr Vyvyan Howard, a senior lecturer on human anatomy and cell biology at Liverpool University, called for the publication of the full study, saying the summary gave "prima facie cause for concern".

Dr Michael Antoniu, an expert in molecular genetics at Guy's Hospital Medical School, described the findings as "very worrying from a medical point of view", adding: "I have been amazed at the number of significant differences they found [in the rat experiment]."

Although Monsanto last night dismissed the abnormalities in rats as meaningless and due to chance, reflecting normal variations between rats, a senior British government source said ministers were so worried by the findings that they had called for further information.

Environmentalists will see the findings as vindication of British research seven years ago, which suggested that rats that ate GM potatoes suffered damage to their health. That research, which was roundly denounced by ministers and the British scientific establishment, was halted and Dr Arpad Pusztai, the scientist behind the controversial findings, was forced into retirement amid a huge row over the claim.

Dr Pusztai reported a "huge list of significant differences" between rats fed GM and conventional corn, saying the results strongly indicate that eating significant amounts of it can damage health. The new study is into a corn, codenamed MON 863, which has been modified by Monsanto to protect itself against corn rootworm, which the company describes as "one of the most pernicious pests affecting maize crops around the world".

Now, however, any decision to allow the corn to be marketed in the UK will cause widespread alarm. The full details of the rat research are included in the main report, which Monsanto refuses to release on the grounds that "it contains confidential business information which could be of commercial use to our competitors".

A Monsanto spokesman said yesterday: "If any such well-known anti-biotech critics had doubts about the credibility of these studies they should have raised them with the regulators. After all, MON 863 isn't new, having been approved to be as safe as conventional maize by nine other global authorities since 2003."
Jesus. GM Corn causing symptoms in rats that suggest either immune system damage or tumors.. Monsanto is keeping the study secret (small wonder) and governments the world over refuse to label GM food what it is.

What ever happened to informing the consumers and letting the vaunted free market decide the fate of GM foods?

Is anyone else as worried about this kind of thing as I am? Am I going to have to pay through the nose to buy organic produce for the rest of my life because my government doesn't give a rat's ass about me?
__________________
Boy, I used to have really cheesey signatures.
  #2  
Old 06-13-2005, 08:05 AM
Norrin Radd Norrin Radd is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: AKRON
Posts: 1,553
Default Re: Revealed: health fears over secret study into GM food

You posted this a week ago and not one response?

Jeesh.

The American people are sheep.

They do not care that bovine growth hormone should have never been approved, they do not care that we add poison to our water, do not care that the former president of the Canadian Dental Association is against adding fluoride to water, do not care about the revoloving door policy at the FDA and do not care about GM foods entering our market without adequate testing.

Pathetic.
  #3  
Old 06-13-2005, 12:01 PM
JHC's Avatar
JHC JHC is offline
Secretary of State
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Florida US
Posts: 5,808
Default Re: Revealed: health fears over secret study into GM food

OK, I feel sufficiently guilty for not having responded.
Particularly since I already knew that starving African nations have refused genetically modified corn for years.
http://www.worldpress.org/Africa/737.cfm

When my daughter started menstruating at the age of 11, I was stunned. That is very early. A friend told me a story that sounded like a conspiracy theory about hormone inhanced beef being the cause of a generation of young girls starting menstruation at earlier ages. I don't know if there's anything to it but I buy organic whenever I can and we seldom eat beef anymore.
__________________
"Consider the daffodil. And while you're doing that, I'll be over here, looking through your stuff.” Jack Handy
  #4  
Old 06-13-2005, 11:13 PM
Gizzey's Avatar
Gizzey Gizzey is offline
Secretary of State
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 4,071
Default Re: Revealed: health fears over secret study into GM food

Quote:
Originally Posted by roddy
an article from the independent.co.uk - I took this full version from commondreams.org:



Jesus. GM Corn causing symptoms in rats that suggest either immune system damage or tumors.. Monsanto is keeping the study secret (small wonder) and governments the world over refuse to label GM food what it is.

What ever happened to informing the consumers and letting the vaunted free market decide the fate of GM foods?

Is anyone else as worried about this kind of thing as I am? Am I going to have to pay through the nose to buy organic produce for the rest of my life because my government doesn't give a rat's ass about me?
I think in the UK more and more people are aware of GM foods and are buying organic.
Demand will bring the prices down. I am already seeing this in supermarkets and farmers markets. A few stores have banned GM foods eg. Iceland and the Co-op.
The government need to pressurised though and made to answer a few questions.
Farmers are given subsidies for growing GM foods.
__________________
[IMG]http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/sharon.smith60@btinternet.com/album?.dir=958f&.src=ph&store=&prodid=&.done=http%3a//uk.photos.yahoo.com/ph//my_photos[/IMG]
  #5  
Old 06-14-2005, 08:43 AM
Norrin Radd Norrin Radd is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: AKRON
Posts: 1,553
Default Re: Revealed: health fears over secret study into GM food

JHC,

Your friend was right about the conspiracy, but I can't say for sure bovine growth hormone is the cause of early menstruation, but I can say there was a conspiracy to approve rBGH and the media is complicit in this conspiracy.

////////

The scientists who wrote the report testified before an inquiry
board earlier this month that they have been pressured by
higher-ups to alter the content of their report, which has now
been published on the internet at www.nfu.ca/nfu/Gapsreport.html.

The purpose of the Canadian report was to identify data gaps, and
procedural gaps, in the handling of Monsanto's application to
market rBGH in Canada.

** Two of the report's authors, and four other Canadian government
scientists, testified that they have been threatened with
transfers to other jobs where "they would never be heard of
again" if they did not speed up approval of Monsanto's rBGH
product in Canada, despite the absence of long-term data showing
the product is safe for humans. Monsanto's application to market
rBGH in Canada has been pending since 1990. According to the
TORONTO STAR, "The scientists contend managers in Health Canada
[the Canadian equivalent of FDA] are more concerned about
pleasing the companies that submit the drug applications and are
paying for their approval than they are about protecting
health."[7] The Canadian scientists have been forbidden to speak
to the press about their concerns, but they testified last month
before a government board of inquiry.

** The same rat-feeding study that has raised such controversy in
the U.S. has also proven controversial in Canada. A Canadian
legislator, Mira Spivak, whose committee is investigating the
approval process for rBGH in Canada, says Canadian health
officials provided her staff with a copy of the Monsanto study in
which the information about the potentially troubling effects of
rBGH on rats was "blocked out."[8]

http://www.organicconsumers.org/rBGH/rach621.htm

////////

Robert Cohen Rips Monsanto
Over RbGH On C-Span

The greatest controversy in FDA history was the approval process for
Monsanto's genetically engineered bovine growth hormone. We shouldn't
be here today! We should not be in this room and I shouldn't be here
because, in 1994, Congress HAD A BILL that was going to require
mandatory labeling of all foods that were influenced by genetic engineering.
I got my Congresswoman to co-sponsor that bill - 181 congresspeople
co-sponsored that bill, and you know what? I learned how Congress works
that year because in 6 months they stalled the bill - 12 members of the
Dairy Livestock & Poultry Committee - they stalled the bill until the 1994
session of Congress expired and the bill died.

I was so upset, I investigated these 12 men and found that collectively they
took $711,000 in PAC money from companies with dairy interests, and
four of the members of the committee took money directly from
Monsanto.

FDA published on August 24, 1990, the first time ever in a peer-reviewed
journal, in "Science". "Science" was started by Thomas Edison in the
1880's. They published a review of bovine somatotropin -bGH -the
genetically engineered cow hormone. And in that review, there were seven
tables of data. Five of those tables came from one study authored by
Richard, Odaglia and Deslex. This is the famous "90-Day Study." Guess
what? This was actually a study lasting for 180 days and when I first heard
about this in 1994, I filed a Freedom of Information Act Request for that
study - because I saw from the data that the average spleen of a lab animal
increased 46%.

I called FDA and spoke with Dick Teske. I said, "46%? You said there
were no biological effects!"

He said, "That's not statistically significant."

I said, "Well, let me see the raw data."

He said, "It's a trade secret."

I called Monsanto, they laughed at me. They said, "It's a trade secret and
you will never see it."

I'm smart, I filed a Freedom of Information Act Request, but I didn't realize
you can't find out the study. I went to Federal Court, I said, "Your honor -
spleen increase of 46%, that's leukemia in 90 days!"

I met with FDA on April 21, 1995, and found out that this was actually a
180-day study.

In Canada, they had this study. I have a letter here [ROBERT COHEN
REACHES INTO HIS BRIEFCASE], an internal memorandum:

"This is to advise you that the copies of reports, letters, etc. for drug
submissions have been stolen from my files."

This was stolen from a scientist's file in Canada. They stole the second half
of the "90-Day Study."

http://www.rag.org.au/baa/monsantomilk.htm

///////

There is much more info on this, but I wanted to post a few tidbits in case anyone was interested.
  #6  
Old 06-14-2005, 03:07 PM
Joao Dasilva Joao Dasilva is offline
Secretary of Defense
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,093
Default Re: Revealed: health fears over secret study into GM food

Another classic example of censorship in our corportae press and nation.

Here's one fot ya:
An elderly uncle of mine was gaining weight so his wife had him switch to diet soda using nutrasweet.

He had a stroke about 6 months after a switch.

His doctor told him to give up the diet soda because of studies linking nutrasweet with strokes.

He did this and lived for another 5 years- sans strokes.

Oh yeah, this was in 1988, fyi..........................
  #7  
Old 06-14-2005, 04:34 PM
Norrin Radd Norrin Radd is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: AKRON
Posts: 1,553
Default Re: Revealed: health fears over secret study into GM food

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joao Dasilva
Another classic example of censorship in our corportae press and nation.

Here's one fot ya:
An elderly uncle of mine was gaining weight so his wife had him switch to diet soda using nutrasweet.

He had a stroke about 6 months after a switch.

His doctor told him to give up the diet soda because of studies linking nutrasweet with strokes.

He did this and lived for another 5 years- sans strokes.

Oh yeah, this was in 1988, fyi..........................
One of the reasons I like discussion forums is because of personal accounts like this. Where else could I hear about this?

Many doctors are afraid to say what they really think, as they know what happens when you fight the monied interests.

tis sad so many people are afraid to say that the emporer wears no clothes.
  #8  
Old 06-15-2005, 05:06 AM
Joao Dasilva Joao Dasilva is offline
Secretary of Defense
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,093
Default Re: Revealed: health fears over secret study into GM food

I'll try to find some for ya.
  #9  
Old 06-15-2005, 05:27 AM
RDK's Avatar
RDK RDK is offline
Eschew obfuscation
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 4,864
Default Re: Revealed: health fears over secret study into GM food

Quote:
Originally Posted by JHC
……

When my daughter started menstruating at the age of 11, I was stunned. That is very early. A friend told me a story that sounded like a conspiracy theory about hormone inhanced beef being the cause of a generation of young girls starting menstruation at earlier ages. …..
There is an alternate theory floating around that the more than adequate nutrition supplemented by all the sexual imagery that young girls are subjected to is the cause of early starting of menstruation.

Don’t really believe the sexual imagery part but there is something to do with the abundance of food. Better food=healthier faster growing and maturing bodies= better chance for a pregnancy to succeed= the body is ready for puberty so it starts.

Usually if there is a competing theory that has some validity and common sense over a vast (left/right/Jewish world domination/neo-con/communist/Black power/ white supremacy/big business/whatever) conspiracy theory, I’ll go with the common sense one every time.
__________________
I always find it strange that only reasonable people agree with me.
  #10  
Old 06-15-2005, 05:42 AM
MattLarson's Avatar
MattLarson MattLarson is offline
Moderator, Bulk Rate
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Casselberry, FL
Posts: 12,693
Default Re: Revealed: health fears over secret study into GM food

Quote:
Originally Posted by RDK
Usually if there is a competing theory that has some validity and common sense over a vast (left/right/Jewish world domination/neo-con/communist/Black power/ white supremacy/big business/whatever) conspiracy theory, I’ll go with the common sense one every time.
GM food caused the WTC collapse! It all makes sense now!

Matt
__________________
Computers programmed * Forums moderated * Lives saved * Closet Nazis unmasked

Low rates. Inquire within.
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.