Thread: UN: Credible evidence Iran working on nuke weapons

Based on liberal argumentation, we should ignore the U.N. After all, the U.N. felt there was credible evidence that Saddam had WMDs, too. So what we should do now is start passing lots of articles condemning Iran and see what happens. I have a good feeling about this.

Hey maybe we should all do as Ron Paul and lie =to ourselves that Iran will be peaceful with the bomb?






Even I cant act that fucking stupid.

Have you noticed that during the Arab spring, the better the relations we had with the country, the sooner it experienced a peoples revolution?
We were pretty tight with Egypt and Algeria, we had welcomed Libya back and lifted sanctions, we still are pretty cold to Syria and Iran.
We opened up to China, back when they were one of the most ideologically pure communist countries in the world, Do we fear them now?
Meanwhile, the hard line on Cuba makes it one of the last Communist states in the world.
Maybe if we showed the Ayatollahs a little love, the people of Iran would show them the gallows.

Originally Posted by goober

Have you noticed that during the Arab spring, the better the relations we had with the country, the sooner it experienced a peoples revolution?
We were pretty tight with Egypt and Algeria, we had welcomed Libya back and lifted sanctions, we still are pretty cold to Syria and Iran.
We opened up to China, back when they were one of the most ideologically pure communist countries in the world, Do we fear them now?
Meanwhile, the hard line on Cuba makes it one of the last Communist states in the world.
Maybe if we showed the Ayatollahs a little love, the people of Iran would show them the gallows.

So what your saying is our government is now involved in the sharia world domination attempt? No thanks I dont want no fucking Caliphate.

Am I mistaken, or have we NOT proven that the "Arab spring" revolutions have moved the respective countries away from radical Islamic control? And am I wrong, or was one of the biggest complaints of liberals that America foments hatred towards the West because it gets involved in their politics? But now suddenly it's "good" that we get involved? And is it just me, or did we just spend a few months bombing the heck out of Libya? So should we start bombing other Arab nations -- and expect that Europe backs us up, of course? And if we do, would liberals applaud THAT? And how is it that our involvement in countries that DON'T constitute a direct and immediate threat to us (e.g., Libya) is viewed as laudable, by the way? And is it the contention that the reason that Cuba remains Communist is because we have an embargo in place? So is it the contention that if we lifted that embargo the people would magically rise up and overthrow the Castro regime? Out of curiosity, why haven't the people in Venezuela overthrown Hugo Chavez?

So many questions ...

Originally Posted by C-B-M

Am I mistaken, or have we NOT proven that the "Arab spring" revolutions have moved the respective countries away from radical Islamic control? And am I wrong, or was one of the biggest complaints of liberals that America foments hatred towards the West because it gets involved in their politics? But now suddenly it's "good" that we get involved? And is it just me, or did we just spend a few months bombing the heck out of Libya? So should we start bombing other Arab nations -- and expect that Europe backs us up, of course? And if we do, would liberals applaud THAT? And how is it that our involvement in countries that DON'T constitute a direct and immediate threat to us (e.g., Libya) is viewed as laudable, by the way? And is it the contention that the reason that Cuba remains Communist is because we have an embargo in place? So is it the contention that if we lifted that embargo the people would magically rise up and overthrow the Castro regime? Out of curiosity, why haven't the people in Venezuela overthrown Hugo Chavez?

So many questions ...

easy answer....Progressives believe in dictatorships.