Thread: Donner Dems say "ANARCHY" is better than Tea Party for Amrerica?

Originally Posted by JDJarvis

Is Dave's house going to be on the Map of Republican residences distributed to the Democratic controlled city dwellers?

I have no idea, I am in California, and he lives in Illinois. I do know there are tour boats on the lake. People want to see the millionaires homes, Uncle Dave is on the tour, they point to his house, and say who he is.

Lake Geneva Wisconsin has been the retreat of Chicago millionaires since they built their own rail siding in the 19th century for their private rail cars. Then their yachts would take them to their summer homes. With all their piers painted white, I found the people a bore. They wouldn't know how to have fun if their lives depended on it. The place is a damn fashion show with millionaires holding court. Scroll down for photos of Lake Geneva mansions. Bill Qualls, Hike around Lake Geneva WI, 18-May-2007

If America truly entered anarchy, these would be some of the houses to burn with the owners in them!

Originally Posted by Latterbach

I have no idea, I am in California, and he lives in Illinois. I do know there are tour boats on the lake. People want to see the millionaires homes, Uncle Dave is on the tour, they point to his house, and say who he is.

Lake Geneva Wisconsin has been the retreat of Chicago millionaires since they built their own rail siding in the 19th century for their private rail cars. Then their yachts would take them to their summer homes. With all their piers painted white, I found the people a bore. They wouldn't know how to have fun if their lives depended on it. The place is a damn fashion show with millionaires holding court.

I'm really not clear on how all that meshes with this comment of yours earlier in the thread:

Originally Posted by Latterbach

You can have all the guns you want, it the access to power that really matters. Republicans pontificate all they want. Democrats own the cities, and maps to your home are easy to distribute.

Originally Posted by JDJarvis

I'm really not clear on how all that meshes with this comment of yours earlier in the thread:

Obviously, these were two different posts on different aspects of this thread. Your point please?

Latterbach
You talk liberal thugs, I talk corporate goons. Both are real, which kind of puts organized crime at both tables doesn't it? That is why this thread. This is not good for the nation. But, we Donner Dems are going to play it like third grade - "the Tea Party started it." I apologize in advance.

Except I provide examples of actual liberal thuggery. Your talk of corporate goons is just that, talk. It is based on an utterly oblivious view of the world that presumes that this is 1911 and not 2011.

By definition, businesses create jobs, period. They do not exist for that purpose, but it is an inevitable and positive by-product of their pursuit of profits. Unions, on the otherhand, over the last 40-50 years have destroyed jobs and industries.

Originally Posted by Latterbach

Not so. Donner Party Dems receive a key chain with their membership. It has a 19th century depiction of cannibalism in the United States - a most moving memento and more useful than a used tea bag.

Right... So I'm just going to say you're not helping your case here. Be it donner dems or tea party fringies (not that all tea partiers are fringies, but the parts of the tea party that are fringies) crazy is crazy. I don't give a rat's ass if you get a fancy keychain. I don't care if they give you a house. Insanity is insanity.

Originally Posted by Latterbach

Again, here is the definition of "anarchy" from the OP and Wiki. Please stay up with the this topic when posting. And remember "American Anarchy" specifically is as of yet undefined.

"Anarchy (from Greek: ἀναρχίᾱ anarchíā, "without ruler") may refer to any of several political states, and has been variously defined by sources. Most often, the term "anarchy" describes the simple absence of publicly recognized government or enforced political authority. When used in this sense, anarchy may or may not imply political disorder or lawlessness within a society. In another sense, anarchy may not refer to a complete lack of authority or political organization, but instead refer to a social state characterized by a lack of a state, ruler, or libertarianism."

You want a state without a state? or ruler? Yeah that's called state of nature and it's not a pretty thing. Without viable threats from some source, rules or laws or commands or orders (whatever the fuck you wish to call them) are not rules or laws or commands or orders at all. They have no force without a government or ruler of some sort to back them up. They might as well be magic spells for all the good they will do you in the state of nature. Did you take that 5 minutes to ponder the ultimate consequences of your proposed actions like I asked you to awhile back? What did you come up with? Describe this "anarchy" that you wish to institute. Be specific.

Originally Posted by Latterbach

Why do I get the impression that you think the old west is as it was depicted in old television series. Good guys, white hats, liberty and justice for all?

If your kid was retarded and made noise on the wagon train, they just left the child in the desert to die. If you made a stink, they would leave you too.

I bet you think that if a sheriff caught a bank robber, he Morandized them. They hung or shot and killed the perpetrator on the spot with or without a judge. They wrapped it up as quickly as they could. People put their energy into their OWN survival not punishing bad guys.

On the rare occaisons where there was a trial, the gallos was already built! It was not unusual to hold court in a saloon with an open bar and let the jury get blasted. Hanging was the finale of a big night in town. Hell, you even took your children to watch.

I know where ideas like yours come from. High school civics, and that is about the depth of history and American politics? The old west was a jungle and so is today. Americans watch too much "Forest Gump" and not enough Steven Seagal. Americans are actually believing the propaganda we dish out to the world as "Americanism." It is a damn cold world out there, and no one really cares about you. You are on your own. America is an illusion the rich sell to make you feel warm and fuzzy, go to work, and not ask too many questions. I should know, I work for an advertising agency. Guys like me generate all the "feel good" crap.

We live in the richest country in the world, and our senior citizens are in homeless shelters. Have you ever eaten in a homeless shelter? I have. Your politics will change when you see illegals pushing senior citizens to the floor to get to the front of a food line. We thought we had a new Sheriff in town, name of "Obama." Let's see if there are any teeth in this new JOBS effort coming this Thursday night, or will it be more "Yes we can" rhetoric.

America like any other country is barbaric and animalistic. We throw an American flag over reality and preach to the world about human rights when WE REALLLY DON'T CARE. How much did you send Somalia? Can you be that honest, or do you have to pray on it? Right, you are going to turn off your computer and write a check now.

If you think I am awful, good. I want to be a slap in your face. At least I am honest, when it comes to what I do to help others.

Probably everyone knows some fellow American unemployed. I wonder how much money Australians, Chinese, or Mexicans have sent to help unemployed Americans? Probably nothing? What do you think? Wake up fellow lefties.

Holy shit we're back in the 1800's? And they've got the internet now? When the fuck did that happen?
So kick the illegals out. If you want that, you don't need a dem in office. They tend to pander to the illegals to secure the largely growing hispanic/latino vote.

Originally Posted by Latterbach

Tell you what. Here is the Nader for President petition in 2012. I'll sign if you do. http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/nad...resident-2010/

Why the fuck would anyone ever vote for nader?

Originally Posted by Latterbach

Desperate words from someone whose entire argument went down the crapper thanks to this picture from his own leaders.

If one spends their time in Google before they post, the risk of embarrassment is greatly reduced. Looking smart is in the details not the noise.


.

That's your argument? Ad hominem attacks on senior citizens who aren't as in touch with popular sexual techniques and the terms for them? Really? That's all you've got?
Should I remind you what the Donner Party was? A pack of people truly unqualified for the trip they were taking who got stuck in the mountains and resorted to cannibalism until some of them were eventually rescued by people actually qualified to make such a trip? Pot, kettle, black.

reality
Why the fuck would anyone ever vote for nader?

A. They lost a bet
B. They hate America
C. They are fools
D. The are socialists
E. All of the above (yes, I realize C&D are a bit redundant)