Visit the Active Site for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . com







To be fair, Palin didn't ever mention Perry by name- but "crony capitalism" is code for Perry, was one much-repeated criticism of him in the last TX governor's election. Read this article, don't stop at the first page-
How Rick Perry Created His State's $27 Billion Budget Crisis | | AlterNet






Interestingly enough, Obama made a major gaffe in PREPARED remarks. He said that Lincoln was the founder of the Republican party. That is false. If Palin had said that off the cuff, or Bachmann, it would be evidence of how stupid they are. Since Obama said it, no big deal.
[CENTER][U]When I gave food to the poor, they called me a saint. When I asked why they are poor, they called me a Communist.
-Bishop Hélder Câmara[/U]
[I]Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
-Abraham Lincoln[/I]
[/CENTER]






Nope. I don't think he's stupid. I just object to using mistakes as evidence of stupidity, and there is a double standard.
It is false but not a "major gaffe" by any means. Lincoln was the first Republican President and it was the controversy over the Kansas Nebraska Act, the origin of the Republicans, that had brought him back into politics. He may not have founded the party himself but he was a major force in that founding and particularly in shaping its earliest policies.
Alizee Jacotey, [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuMLCyPb3NQ"]the reason god invented hips[/URL]
IT'S ON YOUTUBE, IT MUST BE TRUE
"I admire gall" [I]Worf, son of Mog[/I]
[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niqrrmev4mA&NR=1"]Just smoke one cigartte and hush[/URL]






I can be generous and agree that's okay. I just think Republican politicians should get the same deference. To me, the important gaffes are the ones where a politician unintentionally tells the truth. Simply being wrong about a historical or legal or policy fact is something we all do. We can all look like geniuses when we can look something up on the internet, but how many of us answer questions about this stuff offline? And when you do, how often do you get things wrong without the benefit of linking to everything?
That's one of the things that gets me in trouble on discussion boards, I discuss politics on discussion boards the same way I would around a water cooler or at the dinner table. So sometimes I'll say something that turns out to be wrong, and other posters will act like it's a capital offense. I think one of the weaknesses of the internet is that it's made us all better at looking up facts, but worse at thinking.
Bookmarks