Quote:
|
Originally Posted by liberal4
Believe it my friend. Giving credit to a fascist perverting the deffinition of a term for their own political ambition is "LYING." This is the typical tactic of all conservatives and fascist. Plus you dictated that I just accept this perversion and also give credibility to such a ridiculous notion and you demanded that I do thgis via a direct order from you, THEN you made a stupid suggestion that because I did not accept the fascist perversion as truth that I did not know history! All are incredulous and not worthy as far as a reasonable disccussion or concideration.
"Corpration" has no resemblance to your OR Mussolini's perversion of the term. Those are the facts!
|
What is so difficult about this concept: Mussolini meant something else by corporation? Granted, corporation means something different
now but if you said "corporatism" to an Italian circa 1922 they would understand it differently. Words change and mean different things for different people. For instance, "Liberal", which you and I proudly claim to be, meant in the past someone who believed in laissez faire free markets and a lot of things we would consider "conservative". In fact, over seas it means just that still. Many of Margaret Thatcher's policies were "liberal" according to the Brits. I don't understand how putting things in historical context makes me a fascist or reactionary. It boggles the mind! I was merely responding to the quote that dharma4all used to prove that fascism was simply a combination of corporate power and the state. Can someone please help me?