Visit the Active Site for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . com

Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: George Washingon's farewell speech translated into everyday speech

  1. #1
    Samantha's Avatar
    Samantha is offline President
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    11,831

    Default George Washingon's farewell speech translated into everyday speech

    This is a very cool translation of Washington's "old English" into today's English. Check out the first paragraph:

    Quote Originally Posted by George Washington original speech
    Friends and Fellow-Citizens:

    The period for a new election of a citizen to administer the Executive Government of the United States being not far distant, and the time actually arrived when your thoughts must be employed in designating the person who is to be clothed with that important trust, it appears to me proper, especially as it may conduce to a more distinct expression of the public voice, that I should now apprise you of the resolution I have formed to decline being considered among the number of those out of whom a choice is to be made....
    Quote Originally Posted by A bastardization of George Washington's speech
    Sup.

    Elections are coming up, and it’s time to figure out who we wanna give the keys to. I figure it might clear things up if I take a sec to explain why I’m not running.
    Here is the original speech:

    FAREWELL ADDRESS (1796)

    Here is the one you HAVE to read:

    xkcd » Blog Archive » Washington’s Farewell Address Translated into Everyday Speech

    I love what he has to say about foreign policy and public debt.

  2. #2
    Samantha's Avatar
    Samantha is offline President
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    11,831

    Default Re: George Washingon's farewell speech translated into everyday speech

    For example George Washington said this:

    It’ll help a lot if you can avoid permanent rivalries and permanent alliances. Just try to get along with everyone when you can. Otherwise, you’re a slave to your policy, which may take you somewhere bad when the situation changes. Constantly being enemies with a particular country makes you stupid and reactive, and can even lead you to war when you really don’t need to. The government gets all involved in this, and one way or another it turns out badly. Permanent alliances are bad too, because they makes you give stuff up when you shouldn’t, cause jealousy, and divide loyalties of your own citizens, often with pretty bad results.

    The idea of this kind of alliance should scare any real American because it lets foreign countries meddle with us. And remember, if a weak little nation (us) gets too attached to a big strong nation (anyone else) you know we’ll be stuck in that arrangement forever.

    Now, foreign meddling is one of the worst threats around, and you should be constantly paranoid about it. But be careful to be fair and sensible about it, otherwise you’ll get so focused on one country or another that you slip into alliances with other countries. And then, like I said, you turn into tools.
    If only Bush would have learned about George Washington's wise words....but it might be hard for him to follow, the father of our country actually having put it this way:

    So, likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill will, and a disposition to retaliate in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld; and it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation) facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country without odium, sometimes even with popularity, gilding with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation....

    Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial, else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests.

    The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop.

Similar Threads

  1. Sarah Palin Farewell Speech
    By htperr6565 in forum Breaking News in Politics
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 09-03-2009, 11:20 AM
  2. George W. Bush Speech
    By Jason Marcel in forum Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-02-2008, 06:18 PM
  3. Free speech a right...just as long as it is popular speech
    By Slon in forum Abortion, Civil Rights and other Social Issues
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-14-2008, 11:17 AM
  4. Academic freedom of speech is really suppression of speech.
    By Hank in forum U.S. Politics Archives
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 05-24-2005, 01:59 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •